Oregon State University’s novel small farms program is asking producers to help guide where it goes next.

The program is part of OSU Extension and offers classes, workshops and training in the Willamette Valley, Southern Oregon and the Columbia River Gorge. Associate Professor Melissa Fery and Assistant Professor Amy Garrett are asking small farmers to take an on-line survey that will gauge interest in various topics.

The survey asks farmers which production topics interest them, ranging from pasture and grazing management to organic certification, and from fruit, nuts and berries to small grains and diversified vegetables.

Another survey question asks farmers if they are interested in selling directly to schools, hospitals and retirement communities. Food system activists believe institutional buying is an untapped market for many small and mid-size producers, hampered in part by consolidation, storage, processing and distribution problems.

Other survey questions cover business development and agritourism. Another asks respondents if they want to learn more about growing fruit and vegetables without supplemental irrigation; Garrett conducted a “dry farming” trial at OSU.

The survey also asks farmers to rate their interest in learning about livestock and forage topics and woodland management topics. The latter include tree planting, riparian management and timber harvesting.

SALEM — Oregon’s farm regulators encountered no objections to a bill that would authorize them to conduct on-farm inspections and enforce federal food safety law.

The Oregon Department of Agriculture has asked lawmakers to grant it the ability to implement the Food Safety Modernization Act on behalf of the federal government, though the agency remains unsure it will acually use that authority.

Under Senate Bill 18, ODA officials could inspect farms at the behest of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to ensure compliance with food safety standards for raw produce, among other provisions.

Last year, the Oregon Board of Agriculture — an advisory panel overseeing the agency — decided ODA shouldn’t seek federal money for on-farm inspections until it became clearer how FSMA enforcement would be carried out.

The ODA has nonetheless obtained $3.5 million in FDA grant money for FSMA education and outreach over five years, which will likely involve hiring three staff members, said Stephanie Page, the agency’s food safety and animal health director.

At this point, though, the ODA is contemplating cutting inspections of food manufacturers conducted on FDA’s behalf to catch up on state food safety inspections.

Any on-farm inspections and enforcement related to FSMA would be contingent on federal funding, but ODA has proposed SB 18 to confirm it has the necessary statutory authority.

The proposal drew no opposition from the public or members of the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee.

The committee’s chair, Michael Dembrow, D-Portland, said he planned to soon schedule a work session to vote on the bill.

Several other proposals related to ODA regulations have recently gained traction in the legislature, including:

• House Bill 2364, which restores the agency’s ability to mediate among farmers of genetically-engineered, conventional and organic farms. A program to mediate conflicts over cross-pollination and similar issues was created in 2015, but another bill unintentionally removed ODA’s authority to oversee it. The House voted unanimously to approve HB 2364, which corrects the mistake.

• House Bill 2256, which clarifies that ODA can regulate nutritional supplements as food. While the agency already licenses and inspects manufacturers of such products, statutory language wasn’t clear that ODA can regulate them. HB 2256, which formalizes this authority, has unanimously passed the House.

House Bill 2255 aligns language regarding ODA’s authority to regulate pasteurized milk with federal rules. The bill has unanimously passed the House.

• House Bill 2254 exempts Oregon produce headed for foreign markets from labeling requirements. Currently, such crops must be labeled for sale before being shipped overseas, complicating the export process. The House has unanimously approved HB 2254, which allows commodities to be shipped without labels and then labeled in the destination country.

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The second trial involving people who occupied an Oregon wildlife refuge last winter reached closing arguments Tuesday, with the prosecutor telling jurors to use common sense and not overthink a relatively simple case.

“At its core, this case is about four defendants who went too far,” Ethan Knight said.

Knight employed a similar closing argument last fall, when jurors surprisingly acquitted occupation leaders Ammon and Ryan Bundy of conspiring to impede U.S. Interior Department employees from doing their jobs at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge through the use of force, threats or intimidation.

This time around, Knight spent more time stressing that a conspiracy does not have to include a formal agreement. He told jurors to look at the armed patrols, the roadblocks, the thousands of rounds of ammunition found on refuge property and the presence of men with guns sitting at desks where employees would normally sit.

“How do you know there was an agreement? You look to the actions,” he said.

The defendants are Duane Ehmer of Irrigon, Oregon; Jason Patrick of Bonaire, Georgia; Darryl Thorn of Marysville, Washington; and Jake Ryan of Plains, Montana. The men waived their right to a speedy trial last fall, preferring to have more time to prepare.

Three of them are also charged with possessing a firearm in a federal facility. Two are charged with depredation of government property.

They were among the more than two dozen men and women who answered Bundy’s call to occupy the refuge to protest federal control of Western lands and the imprisonment of two ranchers convicted of setting fires on public rangeland.

Defense lawyers in both trials contend the occupation was a peaceful, mostly spontaneous protest in support of the ranchers, and there was no evidence of a conspiracy or specific agreement to impede workers.

“All political protests involve some sort of impediment,” defense attorney Andrew Kohlmetz told jurors in his closing argument. “Democracy itself isn’t always pretty.”

Kohlmetz, who represents Patrick, said “criminal conspiracies thrive is darkness and secrecy,” and those who occupied the refuge acted in an opposite manner, holding news conferences, organizing community meetings and delivering lectures on the Constitution.

He said those who testified during the trial could be broken down into two groups: Witnesses for the government who got their information secondhand and witnesses for the defense who were on the refuge and got an unfiltered view.

Those in the second group, he said, know the occupation was more friendly than menacing.

“The media and law enforcement narrative is just a lie,” he said. “It didn’t jibe with what was going down on the ground.”

The protesters gained control of the refuge on Jan. 2, 2016. The Bundys were arrested in a Jan. 26 traffic stop away from the refuge that ended with police fatally shooting Robert “LaVoy” Finicum, an occupation spokesman.

Defense attorneys in both trials said the situation at the refuge became more chaotic after Finicum’s death, with fears rampant that federal authorities might violently storm the buildings.

Attorney Michele Kohler said that’s why her client, Duane Ehmer, dug a trench, the act for which he is charged with depredation of government property: “He feared for his life.”

Two Oregon State University associate professors won a national science writing award for their collaboration on a children’s book set in Eastern Oregon.

The book, “Ricky’s Atlas, Mapping a Land on Fire,” is the second by stream ecologist and author Judith Li and Peg Herring, communications director for OSU’s College of Agricultural Sciences and who illustrated the book. In February, they received one of five awards for outstanding science writing from the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Subaru of America Inc.

The pair’s first collaboration was “Ellie’s Log: Exploring the Forest Where the Great Tree Fell,” published in 2013. Oregon State University Press published both books.

As the titles suggest, both books center on the adventures of friends Ricky and Ellie. “Ricky’s Atlas” finds the youngsters learning about the impact of wildfire on the dry forest of Eastern Oregon. While visiting the ranch of Ricky’s uncle, a lightning storm touches off a fire and the children later explore the burned area, handle fossils and visit a fire lookout tower. Ricky plots their explorations and findings with maps and field notes. In “Ellie’s Log,” the pair study the aftermath of a huge tree falling to the forest floor during a winter storm.

Li, who is retired from teaching but still does some research at OSU, said “Ricky’s Atlas” is drawn in large part from her years of field work in Eastern Oregon’s John Day River basin. “Ellie’s Log” began as an initiative prompted by the National Science Foundation and grew from research conducted at OSU’s H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest. It also marked the start of Li’s collaboration with Herring, who has a background in fisheries biology and is a longtime science writer at OSU. Li learned to her surprise that Herring also is an artist, and that led to the line drawings and watercolors that illustrate the books.

“I didn’t realize she was such an amazing artist,” Li said. “We discovered we had two little friends in our lives, Ricky and Ellie, who I invented and she illustrated.”

The stories are intended for upper elementary school students, but are not dumbed down, Herring said.

“These are fun books and they’re meant to delight children, but they’re also accurate,” she said. “The science in these books is matched by established scientific benchmarks. The level of precision is appropriate for a 10-year-old, but it’s accurate as well.”

The protagonists record their field notes in journals and make maps, practices that match the work of adult scientists and that Li and Herring hope encourage children to get outside and take note of what they see. Instead of a glossary, the books use margin notes and illustrations to help young readers better understand the text.

“The story is fiction but the information is related to the science of the landscape,” Li said.

The books have received positive reception from teachers, parents and young readers, she said.

Li and Herring are working on two more books in the series; each representing a different part of Oregon. One will take place on the Oregon Coast, with Herring doing the writing this time. The other will examine the natural world that can be found in a city, with Portland being the model.

SALEM — Oregon’s anticipated budget shortfall has prompted lawmakers to consider limiting tax credits for processing livestock manure into energy in biodigesters.

Biodigesters break down manure, releasing methane gas which is used to generate electricity. The remaining solids have many uses.

They are expensive, and farmers have used the tax credits to offset the costs.

Under House Bill 2853, tax credits would only be available for manure processed in biodigesters that were operational before the end of 2016.

The credit effectively costs Oregon about $4 million a year in foregone tax revenue and has the potential to grow more expensive due to the proposed construction of a large dairy, said Rep. Phil Barnhart, D-Eugene, during a March 7 hearing on HB 2853.

Barnhart said he’s not “wedded” to the idea of disqualifying biodigesters that became operational in 2017 or later from tax credits and would appreciate alternative suggestions from the House Agriculture Committee.

“If we don’t do anything, this credit is going to increase significantly over the next couple years,” he said.

The question pertains to how Oregon encourages the adoption of biodigesters, said Barnhart.

The tax credit is one approach, but Oregon could simply require large “confined animal feeding operations” to cover the cost instead of using the general fund, he said.

Lawmakers should consider the extent to which the tax credit encourages the development of new large CAFOs, Barnhart said.

“They have a number of problems associated with them,” such as air and water pollution, he said.

Representatives of the Oregon Dairy Farmers Association, the Oregon Farm Bureau and Threemile Canyon Farms — a dairy near Boardman, Ore. — testified against HB 2853, arguing the tax credit has promoted air quality and contributed to renewable energy development.

By relying on regulation rather than incentives, the government would effectively impose a new tax on dairies as well as their customers, said Len Bergstein, representative of Threemile Canyon Farms.

“There’s a reason we’ve decided to go in a different direction in Oregon,” Bergstein said.

By limiting the tax credit, lawmakers would unwittingly be playing into the anti-dairy agenda of certain activists who oppose new facilities in Oregon, he said.

Dairy producers already made a sacrifice last year, when they agreed for the tax credit to be reduced from $5 per wet ton of manure to $3.50 in exchange for keeping the incentive until 2021, Bergstein said.

However, Bergstein said other options were possible, such as setting a cap on the amount of tax credits that can be earned from biodigesters or reducing the per-ton credit amount over the life of a project.

Friends of Family Farmers, a group that’s critical of large CAFO operations, said tax credits shouldn’t be available to new biodigesters until Oregon implements a program to control dairy emissions.

Since 2007, when the tax credit was enacted, the number of dairies in Oregon has fallen from nearly 600 to fewer than 240, Maluski said. “If Oregon’s goal with this tax credit is to support struggling small and mid-sized dairy farms, it has failed.”

SALEM — The latest count of Oregon wolves shows there are eight breeding pairs in Eastern Oregon, meaning state wildlife officials move into a management plan phase that potentially could ease restrictions on killing them if they decimate deer and elk herds or chronically attack livestock.

Under Oregon’s wolf plan, three consecutive years of at least seven breeding pairs advances the state into what’s known as Phase III management. The ODFW Commission is scheduled to receive the annual wolf report at its April 21 meeting in Klamath Falls.

Oregon Wild, the Portland-based conservation group that has been heavily involved in development of the state’s wolf plan, called the count of breeding pairs “heartening” but warned it could lead to wolves being killed by “trophy hunting” or under the plan’s “controlled take” provision.

“Controlled take” means wolves can be killed if they are causing declines in elk and deer populations or are involved in chronic livestock attacks. Arran Robertson, Oregon Wild spokesman, said the group worries the policy will be used to kill wolves. He said more deer are lost to poachers than to wolves.

ODFW spokesman Rick Hargrave said the wolf plan does not allow a general hunting season on wolves. “This policy differentiates Oregon from other states like Idaho and Montana which currently allow general season hunting of wolves,” he said in an email.

Hargrave said ODFW has no immediate plans to propose controlled take of any wolves in Oregon. The five-year update to the Wolf Management Plan will provide clarity regarding this issue.

In a prepared statement, ODFW wolf biologist Russ Morgan said the state will continue to prioritize “non-lethal solutions to wolf conflicts.”

“Take (killing) of wolves can only be considered as a management response in very specific situations and there are no plans for controlled take at this time,” Morgan said in the statement.

Oregon’s wolf population has grown steadily in the decade since the first wolves migrated from Idaho into Northeast Oregon. The state had a minimum of 110 wolves at the end of 2015, and the 2016 count, due to be reported at the April ODFW Commission meeting, is expected to top that number.

ODFW officials have described Oregon’s wolf population growth as a biological success story, and the state commission took wolves off the state endangered species list in 2015. They remain protected under the federal Endangered Species Act in areas west of U.S. highways 395, 78 and 95.

The state management plan hinges on the number of breeding pairs, defined as two adult wolves that produce at least two pups that survive through the end of the year. Oregon counted nine breeding pairs at the end of 2014, 11 in 2015 and eight at the end of 2016.

SALEM — Oregon farmers would dodge a key requirement of two bills aimed at improving schedule predictability for workers but still face a “show-up pay” requirement for canceled shifts.

Under House Bill 2193 and Senate Bill 828, large employers in the retail, food service and hospitality industries would have to provide workers with additional compensation if their schedules are changed with less than two-weeks’ notice, among other provisions.

Proponents say the bills are necessary because workers in these sectors often contend with schedule disruptions that prevent them from pursuing an education, obtaining adequate childcare or even getting sufficient sleep.

Critics say it’s unrealistic for employers to plan two weeks ahead for canceled events, family emergencies, unforeseen worker departures and other incidents that can upend schedules.

While agriculture isn’t included in the two weeks’ notice requirement, farmers would nonetheless have to compensate workers who show up for a shift that’s shortened or canceled with less than 24-hours’ notice.

The employer would then pay workers at their regular wage for the missing hours, or four hours, whichever is less.

Farmers have objected to this provision because foul weather can unexpectedly delay harvests or other operations, so requiring “show-up pay” would unreasonably impose a heavy financial strain.

“Weather plays a big role and we have no control over this,” said Anne Krahmer, whose family raises blueberries in the Willamette Valley, during a March 6 hearing on HB 2193.

Krahmer said she closely watches weather forecasts and communicates with workers, but has nonetheless been forced to cancel berry-picking after only an hour or two due to rain.

If she had to pay 150 workers an average of $15 for each of the four hours they didn’t harvest fruit, the cost would come to $9,000 for a single day.

“It would only take a few days to put me out of business at this rate,” Krahmer said.

Apart from “show-up pay,” growers are concerned about provisions related to a worker’s right to request a flexible schedule, said Jenny Dresler, state public policy director for the Oregon Farm Bureau.

Employers must keep records of every conversation with workers about requested schedule changes, creating another unrealistic paperwork obligation, she said.

“If those conversations are happening out in the field, that’s really absurd,” Dresler said.

Under the bills, interfering with a worker’s right to request schedule changes would be considered retalation, an unlawful employment practice that’s penalized by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries.

The Oregon Farm Bureau is concerned that “interfering” can be interpreted too broadly to accuse employers of retaliation, Dresler said. “It sets up a ‘gotcha’ for small business.”

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The average statewide snowpack for Oregon is well above normal for March after a harsh winter that featured heavy snow across much of the state.

However, hydrologists warn that an early thaw could quash hopes for above-average summer stream flows.

Snowpack levels as of March 1 were 138 percent of normal, according to numbers released Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service.

The service conducts the surveys monthly during the water year, which runs from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30, said Scott Oviatt, a snow survey supervisory hydrologist for the USDA service.

The last time Oregon’s snowpack was well above normal on March 1 was in 2008, when it was 157 percent of normal. Last year, the snowpack was 94 percent of normal at the end of February.

The news came as a boon for farmers, ranchers and irrigators who have weathered several years of drought in much of eastern Oregon. If the weather remains cool and the snow doesn’t melt until late spring, above-average stream levels could replenish drinking water supplies and also mean good news for migrating salmon, Oviatt said.

“Snow accumulation during February was twice the normal amount at many monitoring locations,” he said.

Last year, excitement about near-average snowpack levels evaporated when unusually warm April weather melted the snow early, depriving farmers, salmon and reservoir operators of late-season runoff they needed.

All basins in the state have received well-above-average precipitation for the 2017 water year.

Lake County and Goose Lake basins have gotten the most, at 152 percent of average, while Mt. Hood, Sandy and the Lower Deschutes basins have had 111 percent of normal precipitation, the service said.

Lake Owyhee Reservoir, near the Idaho border, is now at 128 percent of average after several years of water levels that were well below average. The lake is now storing more than 500,000 acre-feet of water for the first time since 2012, Oviatt said.

Heavy snow has also meant reservoirs in Malheur and Baker counties are the fullest they’ve been in years, he added.

The reservoirs “aren’t near the normal or average levels, but they’re higher than they have been in the past,” he said. “It is good for farmers and irrigators.”

PENDLETON, Ore. — The Umatilla County Weed Department has received more than $25,000 from the state to uproot two species of noxious weeds invading local farms and watersheds.

Officials plan to treat 90 acres of tansy ragwort near Milton-Freewater and Pilot Rock, and another 200 acres of common bugloss in the Walla Walla River Basin. Both projects were funded by a pair of grants from the Oregon State Weed Board.

Tansy ragwort, with its dark green leaves and bright yellow flowers, has been found on Saddle Mountain above Milton-Freewater and in the Bear Creek drainage above Pilot Rock. It is toxic to cattle, and both areas are used primarily for grazing.

“Our goal is to reduce the seed bank, eradicate and control the spread of tansy ragwort throughout the county,” said Teddy Orr, county weed department supervisor.

Of the 90 acres treated, 60 will be in the Saddle Mountain area and 30 on Bear Creek. Workers will continue to monitor another 2,500 acres between the two sites.

Common bugloss was first discovered locally in Meacham Canyon, and traced back to the Walla Walla River drainage near Milton-Freewater. It is a perennial herb, growing about two feet tall with deep blue or purple flowers. Once the plant spreads into an alfalfa field, it can be difficult to control and molds hay from the inside out.

Orr said the weed poses a threat to farmers, and the department plans to target 200 acres of farm and residential land around the Walla Walla River. Letters will be sent to private landowners asking for permission to access and treat common bugloss on their property.

Treatment is expected to begin April 1 and will be finished by Nov. 1, roughly the time when common bugloss blooms for the year. Tansy ragwort control is expected to run from June 1 through Sept. 15.

Anyone with questions about weed identification and control should contact the county weed department at 541-278-5462.

PENDLETON, Ore. — Marika Sitz knew she wanted to return to Eastern Oregon. Her timing couldn’t be better.

After graduating from Pendleton High School in 2011, Sitz moved to Silicon Valley where she earned her bachelor’s degree in human biology from Stanford University. Her focus was predominantly on food and agricultural systems, which led to an interest in water development and sustainability.

Now, as local farmers find themselves on the cusp of new irrigation supplies that could mean hundreds of millions of dollars for the basin, Sitz has come home to revive the dormant Oregon Water Coalition, a nonprofit group formed 25 years ago to promote water resources.

Sitz, 24, was officially hired in January as coordinator for the coalition. She will serve at the recommendation of an eight-member board of directors, including longtime irrigators and irrigation district managers.

“It’s nice to be able to come back to a small town like this and have an opportunity like this,” Sitz said.

Sitz is a former PHS athlete and Lantern Cup winner, the school’s highest award for personal and classroom achievement. Her family comes from a cattle ranching background and she said rural issues have always informed her way of thinking — even after college in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Sitz graduated from Stanford in 2015, and followed that up with a one-year fellowship with the Bill Lane Center for the American West. It was there she became involved with a program called Water in the West, researching solutions to the region’s increasing water shortage.

From there, Sitz said she began looking at opportunities in Oregon and came across the Northeast Oregon Water Association, or NOWA. That’s the group working to negotiate new mitigated water rights for Umatilla and Morrow county farmers out of the Columbia River, a delicate and lengthy effort with potentially huge economic rewards.

Sitz reached out to J.R. Cook, executive director for NOWA and a board member for the Oregon Water Coalition. Cook said he felt Sitz would be a great fit for the water coalition, which formed in 1992 to educate and do outreach, but had largely become inactive and nearly dissolved last year.

“(Sitz) lit a fire under us,” Cook said.

With Sitz on board, Cook said the coalition has been reborn. And though Sitz said she is still learning the ropes, she is already at work rebuilding their website and re-establishing their community partnerships.

“It’s a little bit about finding our place,” she said.

Ray Kopacz, coalition vice president and manager of the Stanfield Irrigation District, said it will take some time to get themselves organized after years of sitting in limbo.

“It never really died. We just lost some key people who were helping run it,” Kopacz said.

Sitz plans to stay with the coalition for two years before applying to law school. She said the relationships she builds now will be invaluable down the road.

“Water is not going to become any less important in the future,” she said. “It’s just key to the economic engine of so many areas.”

When Sitz leaves, Cook said they hope to continue recruiting new blood to carry on the work that’s already been done. It has taken 30 years of work to get to where they are now, he said, and it will be up to the new guard to see many of these projects to fruition.

“The goal is to bring people Marika’s age back our way to work for northeast Oregon,” Cook said.

A Northeast Oregon wolf died after it bit a spring-loaded cyanide powder trap set by USDA Wildlife Services in an apparent violation of an informal agreement it had with state officials not to use the devices in areas frequented by wolves.

OR-48, a 100-pound male from the Shamrock Pack, died Feb. 26 after it bit an M-44 device, which fires cyanide powder into a predator’s mouth when it tugs on a baited or scented capsule holder. Wildlife Services set the trap on private land in an attempt to kill coyotes. The federal agency kills predators or other wildlife that damage or pose a threat to property, livestock or humans. The agency’s website describes the M-44 as an “effective and environmentally sound wildlife damage management tool.”

It’s primarily used to kill coyotes, wild dogs and foxes. The agency’s website said animals that trigger the device fall unconscious and die within one to five minutes. Sodium cyanide powder in the capsule reacts with saliva in the animal’s mouth, producing deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.

Use of the device was prohibited in areas of known wolf activity when wolves were listed as endangered under Oregon law. After wolves were taken off the state endangered species list in 2015, U.S. Wildlife Services said it would continue to avoid using M-44s, ODFW spokesman Rick Hargrave said.

He said Wildlife Services held an Incidental Take Permit that allowed it to conduct wildlife control operations in protected wolf areas but prohibited M-44s. The Incidental Take Permit expired when wolves were de-listed, but Wildlife Services indicated it would continue following the permit rules, Hargrave said.

“We discussed our concerns specifically regarding M-44s,” he said. “We didn’t want those devices in those areas.”

“We believed it was clear what our concerns were,” Hargrave said.

“The death of this wolf shows the risk involved when wolves are in areas where Wildlife Services conducts these types of operations,” said Doug Cottam, ODFW Wildlife Division administrator. “This is a situation we take seriously and we’ll be working with Wildlife Services with the goal of preventing it from happening again.”

Dave Williams, state director for Wildlife Services in Oregon, said the agency has begun an internal review to “see if any changes to our procedures are necessary.”

OR-48, the wolf that died, was believed to be almost two years old. Hargrave said he was not the Shamrock Pack’s breeding male, and may have been in the process of dispersing from the pack and establishing its own territory, as young adults do. The incident site was on the edge of the Shamrock Pack’s territory.

OR-48 had been captured and fitted with a tracking collar Feb. 10, according to ODFW.

SALEM — Sewage sludge already serves as fertilizer on Oregon farms but a proposed bill would also permit processing the waste within farm zones.

It’s common for biosolids, also called human manure, to be treated at wastewater plants then applied to fields that aren’t producing crops meant for human consumption.

Wayne Buma, who operates AAA Advanced Septic Cleaning in Southern Oregon, wanted to use waste from septic tanks in the same way but ran into troubles with Jackson County’s government.

The county’s objection wasn’t based on sanitary issues, but rather Oregon’s land use laws: It wasn’t clear that sewage treatment is allowed on land zoned for “exclusive farm use.”

“There is nothing new going on as far as the safety. All that has been approved,” Buma told members of the House Agriculture Committee at a March 2 hearing.

Under House Bill 2179, the statute would clarify that on-farm biosolids treatment is allowed in farm zones as long as it’s conducted with mobile units.

If on-farm biosolids treatment isn’t allowed, Buma said he’d have to separately process the waste at the location of each septic tank, rather than collectively treat the material in a large tank at the site of application.

“Right now, it’s bottle-necked,” he said.

The treatment process described by Buma, which is permitted by Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality, is fairly straightforward.

Biosolids are filtered to remove plastic and other debris, then agriculture lime is mixed with the waste to make it alkaline and kill pathogens. The sterilized biosolids are then spread across a field with truck.

“It’s a stable product, it’s not a haz-mat material,” Buma said of the lime that’s integral to the process.

Legislators seemed amenable to HB 2179, with the committee’s chair, Brian Clem, D-Salem, actually testifying in favor of the bill as a “no-brainer.”

While Oregon’s land use laws generally confine processing activities within “urban growth boundaries,” that often involves increasing the “truck miles” required to transport materials, Clem said.

In this case, there is no construction of a permanent facility that would taken farmland out of production, he said.

“If it’s not displacing farmland, I think it’s good to have processing as close to the source of the material as possible,” Clem said.

EUGENE, Ore. (AP) — President Trump is mentioned so many times in the workshop leaflets for this weekend’s University of Oregon Public Interest Environmental Law Conference, you’d think the president was going to make a personal appearance.

But Trump isn’t a guest at the 35th annual conference put on by Oregon Law students; he’s just casting a long shadow over the proceedings.

“We’re fearing the worst,” said Jeremy Nichols, who directs the climate and energy program at the Golden, Colo., offices of WildEarth Guardians. “We’ve been working for years to steadily limit the supply of coal available so that clean energy can take hold.”

Nichols fears Trump may reverse that trend.

In mid-February, Trump rescinded an Obama-era regulation aimed at limiting the amount of coal mine wastes that can be dumped in streams.

The Trump administration also stopped defending federal rules in a lawsuit brought by coal companies. The rules required the companies to pay higher royalties on coal mined from public lands that’s often shipped overseas.

“Those are a couple of examples,” Nichols said, “and mind you, we’re only a little over a month into this administration.”

Environmentalists also fret about Trump’s pick for secretary of the Interior, Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., who won U.S. Senate confirmation Wednesday.

Zinke received large campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry, including from fracking giant Oasis Petroleum, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

He is a former board member and a current stock owner of Santa Barbara, Calif.-based oil company QS Energy, according to the nonprofit campaign finance organization.

“One of Trump’s big selling points,” Oakland-based Sierra Club attorney Nathaniel Schoaff said, “is we should trust him because he has so much money he doesn’t have to listen to special interests.

“That resonated with a lot of people. The problem is he put special interests in charge — or people who are very sympathetic (to) — of some of the most important agencies that the federal government has.”

Conservative groups say Trump’s moves will boost the economy, create jobs and accelerate economic growth.

Nichols and Schoaff are scheduled to appear together at the UO law conference at a panel titled “Still Saving the Climate: Confronting Public Lands & Coal Mining Under a Trump Administration.”

Other conference panels are addressing “Fighting for Safe and Sustainable Food and Farming under Trump,” “Border Insecurity: How Walls and Militarization Harm People and Wildlife in the Borderlands” and “Criminal Defense and Environmental Activism.”

A pamphlet for the latter warns, “With Trump administration ... many are expecting particularly harsh repression of these activists.”

Conference participants will discuss legal strategies, learn from Third World tactics — and find strength with like-minded activists.

The conference theme is “One Cause, One Voice.”

“The environmental movement sometimes is plagued by infighting by people who disagree where the lines of compromise should be drawn. That’s not the sign of an unhealthy movement. It’s a robust discourse,” Nichols said.

“But we’re at moment where, really, should we be spending the energy having those fights? Or should we say we all bring strength and power to this broad moment and work to advance the higher good?” he added.

The “Many Faces of Forest Law” workshop material urges, “As we move through the uncharted territory of a Trump administration, it is increasingly important for the environmental community to come together and cultivate new relationships.”

The ELAW global environmental nonprofit organization has gathered 100 lawyers from 50 countries from around the globe in Eugene — and they’ll attend and present at the law conference. ELAW is based in Eugene.

A panel on “Challenging Coal Around the World,” will include ELAW speakers from India, Kenya, Australia and Pakistan.

“Coal mining is fundamentally about climate change, and climate change is a global issue. It’s good to have that context,” Nichols said.

Lawyer panelists urge their colleagues at the conference to redouble their watchdog efforts.

“There is a big risk that this administration will start entering into sweetheart settlements with industry groups, particularly fossil fuel groups,” Schoaff said.

Environmental groups can seek to intervene in court cases in order to have a say in the outcomes.

“Now is not the time to settle for one or two key legal arguments,” Nichols said. “We need to put it all on the table and be as creative and unrelenting as possible in trying to create uncertainty, generate crisis, and make the coal industry and this administration feel some pain for every rollback and every giveaway that they may even contemplate.

“It’s not so much about identifying the, quote, winning legal argument. It’s really about getting behind every argument and coming in with energy and commitment and passion to follow it through, and, in many cases, take a risk. We have so much to lose right now.”

SALEM — Danny Grimm shares many of the concerns familiar to producers throughout the Pacific Northwest and Northern California. Start with federal regulatory overreach, because the recent, undefined rumblings out of the Trump administration about “greater enforcement” are enough to give anyone pause.

Throw in questions about water quality and nutrient inputs, plus a complicated infrastructure of pumps, water lines and electrical controls that Grimm and his employees must maintain. And don’t forget pests. Like many producers he’d rather not use chemical insecticides, and so far he’s protecting his crop with battalions of predator mites, ladybugs and beneficial nematodes.

“Once you’re having problems, if you don’t know how to fix it, bugs will eat you alive,” Grimm said.

The biggest issue is market uncertainty. Farmers are always looking for the next big thing, and a lot of people are jumping in to meet the demand. But what looks like a gold rush now could go south if over-supply drops the price.

Grimm said scaling up production will be the biggest challenge for small producers.

“It goes like any other industry,” he said. “There will be people who fail and people who make it — people who are able to scale up and keep the quality.”

Grimm, 31, grows cannabis. He’s the owner of Uplifted Farm, and his crop land is a dilapidated warehouse in an industrial area off Salem’s Portland Road. He’s scrapped, made-do and scrambled to succeed. By at least one measure, he’s an excellent grower. This past summer, the first time the Oregon State Fair accepted cannabis plants for judging, he won blue ribbons for his Granddaddy Purple, an Indica variety, and his Super Sour Diesel, a more psychoactive Sativa variety.

This spring, Grimm will move Uplifted Farm into a massive old concrete building that used to be a slaughterhouse. He and his partner, Nathan Martinez, will have 30,000 square feet of growing space in what Grimm estimates is a $5 million renovation.

“I’m all in,” Grimm said.

Don’t tell him he’s not a farmer, or that cannabis is not an agricultural crop.

“Absolutely,” he said. “It’s no different.”

The guidelines, growing and cropping techniques involved in raising marijuana could be applied to grapes, tomatoes or anything else, he said.

Individual producers may not favor pot farming, but the Oregon Department of Agriculture has given its official approval. After voters legalized adult recreational production, possession and use in 2014, then-department Director Katy Coba famously declared, “Welcome to the family.” Since then, the department has taken growers in hand to help them through the regulatory network.

“It may not look the same as what we’re used to, but it’s definitely agriculture,” said Sunny Jones, a pesticide expert who was picked as the department’s cannabis policy coordinator. “That’s definitely been ODA’s take on the situation; it’s one more crop in the many crops that Oregon grows.”

Jones said pot growers demonstrate a work ethic and problem-solving ability that traditional agriculturists would admire.

“When many of us think of farmers, we think of someone creative, someone who can keep the equipment running with baling wire and duct tape,” she said. “That is abundant in the cannabis industry.”

What’s also abundant is the money and economic spin-off that accompanies legalization. Cannabis activists have long maintained pot is Oregon’s most valuable crop. While there aren’t official farm gate numbers available to back that up, a former Oregon State University professor estimated in 2015 that the state’s pot crop was worth $948 million annually, or more than the combined value of hazelnuts, pears, wine grapes, Christmas trees and blueberries.

The 17 percent tax on recreational pot sales is an open spigot. The Oregon Department of Revenue received $5.3 million in tax payments in January 2017, and said it has received $65.4 million in cannabis tax collections since January 2016. After the department’s administrative costs are met, 40 percent of the tax revenue goes to the Common School Fund, 20 percent to mental health, alcohol and drug services, and 15 percent to the Oregon State Police. Cities, counties and other services split the remainder.

Advocacy groups say pot legalization creates jobs. New Frontier Data, a Washington, D.C., analytics firm that specializes in cannabis issues, estimated the sector would create more than 280,000 jobs by 2020. Adult cannabis use is now legal in eight states and in D.C., areas with a combined population of 69 million, the group said.

Producers thinking about growing cannabis, however, should realize major questions have not yet been answered.

Most critically, it is still illegal under federal law. On the books, marijuana is listed as a Schedule 1 controlled substance. Cannabis activists say the ranking is ludicrous because it puts pot in the same category as heroin and LSD, while methamphetamine and cocaine are Schedule 2 drugs, a notch below.

Current state-level legalization is based on a shoulder-shrug interpretation of the August 2013 “Cole Memorandum,” named for James Cole, an assistant U.S. attorney general who wrote it.

In the memo, the Obama administration essentially said it wouldn’t interfere so long as states legalizing cannabis had “strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems” in place. The administration didn’t want pot available to minors, crossing into states that hadn’t legalized it and funding the operations of cartels and gangs.

Growers, processors and retailers in Washington, Oregon, California and elsewhere took that as a sign to get busy.

“Why did everyone just start blowing through this risk factor like they couldn’t care less?” a lawyer-blogger with Portland’s Emerge Law Group wrote. One reason was “the fact that so many people are involved in the industry now that there’s a feeling of safety in sheer numbers. ‘What are they going to do? Arrest everyone?’”

Probably not, the blogger concluded, but Trump and conservative Attorney General Jeff Sessions could deliver a “big chill” if they decided to change course.

On Feb. 24, Trump press secretary Sean Spicer said the Justice Department would pursue “greater enforcement” of laws regarding recreational-use marijuana. The off-hand remark confused the situation.

“Trump seems insistent on throwing the marijuana market back into the hands of criminals, wiping out tax-paying jobs and eliminating billions of dollars in taxes,” said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. The group is a Washington, D.C., based lobbying group that favors marijuana and other drug policies “grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights.”

New Approach Oregon, the Portland group that backed and works to implement Oregon’s 2014 legalization of adult recreational cannabis use, called Spicer’s remarks “concerning.”

But New Approach Director Anthony Johnson said Trump and Sessions hadn’t been heard from.

“Greater enforcement by the Justice Department, if it does occur, could mean that the federal government may just monitor state-regulated businesses more closely,” Johnson said in a prepared statement. “Potentially, federal charges could be brought if cannabis businesses violate state law and regulations, such as selling marijuana to minors under the age of 21.”

The availability of capital and banking services also are major questions for cannabis producers, processors and retailers, because federally regulated banks aren’t supposed to handle money from illegal businesses.

Garrett Rudolph, editor of Marijuana Venture magazine, said banks’ relationship to the cannabis industry is “basically a giant gray area.”

The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCen, issued a 2014 guideline that allowed banks to work with state-legal cannabis businesses that were following the Cole Memorandum rules. But FinCen “put the onus of due diligence on the banks,” Rudolph said by email, and many financial institutions are unwilling to take that risk.

Nonetheless, the economic buzz of cannabis legalization escalates.

At the annual Cannabis Collaborative Conference in Portland in February, vendors of all types displayed the technology, products and services that have sprung up in step with legalization.

At one booth, a company called Root Sciences, with an office in Belfair, Wash., showed German-made distillation equipment that produces 99 percent pure cannabinoid oil concentrates for use in medical products or recreational edibles. One model sells for $159,000, which includes shipping, installation and training.

Down another aisle at the convention, 69-year-old electrical contractor Gregory Fuller showed his mobile growing unit. Fuller, of Federal Way, Wash., retrofitted a shipping container with LED grow lights and insulation. The unit’s electrical requirement is small enough that it can operate on 200-amp residential service. Plug and play, as it were.

“This is agriculture,” Fuller said. “I can grow 2,000 pounds of lettuce in here a year.”

But it’s pot growers he’s marketing to, and the units sell for $110,000. Fuller laughs as he tells of dealing with old counter-culture types who peel off $100 bills but provide little detail about who they are, what they want and what they’re doing.

“You have to have the patience of Job to work with these guys,” he said.

At another booth, veteran grower Joe Pietri promoted his “Grow Like Joe” methods and his book, “The 15-Ounce Pound,” in which he predicts “Big Pharma” will patent cannabis and use the IRS and DEA to control other growers.

He said pot growers need to match the efficiency of commercial nurseries.

“If you can’t grow cannabis like they do chrysanthemums, they will wipe you out,” Pietri told a couple people who stopped at his booth. “You won’t survive in this industry.”

Representatives of a Colorado “Hemp Temps” company said they offer growers trained and temporary bud tenders, trimmers and harvesters. The company expects to open an Oregon branch this spring.

Jenny Argie, from Brooklyn, New York, demonstrated products she offers through her company, Baked At Home. Argie is a cancer survivor, and used cannabis as an alternative to pharmaceuticals to manage pain and nausea. She sells legal cookie, cake and brownie mixes that allow buyers to add their own cannabis oil at home. That gives users control over their dosage, Argie said.

Argie joked that she’s become the Betty Crocker of cannabis baking.

“The interest and enthusiasm is so big,” she said.

Argie also sells lotions infused with CBD, or cannabidiol, which along with THC is one of the primary elements of pot. CBD doesn’t get users high, however, and is primarily used for pain relief.

Danny Grimm, the Salem grower who is expanding his business, was at the Portland conference with the blue ribbons he won at the Oregon State Fair.

“It’s a pretty big deal,” he said.

The action of federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who detained multiple people after stopping a pair of worker transport vans near Woodburn, Ore., last week may have been a routine operation, but it happened in an acrimonious political atmosphere that had civil rights groups blaming it on the Trump administration’s belligerence toward immigrants.

An ICE spokeswoman said agents initially were after two people, both of whom had multiple prior arrests and one of whom had a prior conviction, when they stopped the vehicles on a highway outside Woodburn on Feb. 24. Agents detained 11 people on allegations they were in the country illegally; seven of them remained in custody Feb. 28. Four were let go because an immigration judge had previously released them on bond pending removal proceedings, the ICE spokeswoman said.

As far as ICE was concerned, the action was routine. People who are in the country illegally and have criminal records are among the highest priority for apprehension and removal, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

“Deportation officers conduct enforcement actions every day around the country and in Oregon as part of the agency’s ongoing efforts to uphold public safety and border security,” an ICE spokeswoman said in a prepared statement. “Our operations are targeted and lead driven, prioritizing individuals who pose a risk to our communities.”

But the action comes amid heightened political tension over border security and illegal immigration. Pacific Northwest agriculture has a major stake in the outcome, as many sectors rely on pruning, harvest or processing crews that are heavily immigrant, legal or not.

ICE provided a link to a Homeland Security memorandum that implements Trump’s executive order on immigration enforcement. The memo calls for hiring 10,000 more ICE agents and prioritizes enforcement action against aliens who have been convicted of any crime, charged with a crime but not resolved, committed fraud or “willful misrepresentation” with a government agency or abused any program to receive public benefits. It also authorizes removal of anyone who “in the judgment of an immigration officer” poses a risk to public safety or national security.

But the Portland office of American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group, and the farmworker and forestry labor union Pineros y Compesinos Unidos del Noroeste (PCUN) criticized the action.

Pedro Sosa, spokesman for the American Friends group, said in his opinion ICE has increased its activity and is acting more aggressively since President Trump signed the order. Sosa said that’s created “more fear in our community.”

The immigrant advocacy groups said they were “deeply concerned” about such stops and arrests and their impact on schools, the local economy and security. The groups denounced the “racist policies” of Trump that “criminalize and scapegoat hardworking immigrants and divide Americans.”

Details provided by ICE and by the immigrant advocacy groups varied somewhat.

American Friends and PCUN said 19 people were detained in the operation and 10 were released. They said the workers were on their way to forest jobs picking baby’s breath, a decorative plant used in arrangements, when they were stopped.

Rhetoric aside, it’s too early to know how the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement numbers will stack up against the Obama administration’s.

The Department of Homeland Security apprehended 530,250 people in the 2016 fiscal year, President Obama’s last year in office. That was about 60,000 more than during the 2015 fiscal year. The figures include apprehensions by the U.S. Border Patrol and by ICE.

A former Pacific Northwest business consultant who has studied the issue said the Obama administration targeted known criminals for arrest and deportation and didn’t bother with others that might get caught up in raids. “Trump just told ICE to go after criminals, but if there are others there, take them too,” the former consultant said.

“Familial considerations,” such as having children in the country, no longer apply in detention and deportation decisions, he said.

“There are agricultural workers in Idaho who are afraid to go to the grocery store or go see their kids play in an athletic event,” he said. “It is a shame.”

The former consultant asked not to be identified because he is not authorized by his current employer to make public statements on the issue. However, he has experience in immigration and agricultural issues.

Based on a description of the ICE traffic stops in Oregon and the type of job the workers were headed to, he said the people taken into custody were probably day workers who may not have been in the country long.

“Often times they’re more likely to have a criminal record or something that would show up in a background check” and keep them from more regular employment, he said.

The consultant acknowledged that the Trump administration can accurately point out that the people detained were in the country illegally and had no right to be here.

“From that point of view, yes,” the source said. “However, when there is no guest worker program for ag or forestry, for nurseries, what choice do employers have and what choice do employees have?” he asked.

The source said various groups have tried since 2007 to institute a guest worker program that allowed people to legally enter the U.S. on a temporary basis. President George W. Bush proposed a plan that would have worked, he said, but was rejected by Congress. Now neither political party wants the other party to get credit for solving the problem, he said.

SALEM — Intense opposition by Oregon’s farmers, ranchers and forestland owners has apparently convinced lawmakers to back away from altering key property tax provisions affecting agriculture and forestry.

Machinery used for agriculture and forestry is exempt from property tax assessments while property dedicated to producing crops, livestock and timber is less heavily taxed than other real estate.

Under the original language of House Bill 2859, the property tax exemption for equipment and the farm use assessment for land would expire in 2024 unless renewed by lawmakers.

The proposal evoked alarm in Oregon’s natural resource community, which turned out in full force at a March 1 hearing to argue that creating a “sunset” for these provisions would financially destabilize farming, ranching and forestry.

By the end of the hearing, the overwhelmingly negative testimony against HB 2859 seemed to have the desired effect on members of the House Revenue Committee.

“I’m pretty convinced putting a sunset on these things that are very long-term assets doesn’t make any sense,” said Rep. Phil Barnhart, D-Eugene, the committee’s chair.

At the beginning of the hearing, Barnhart said the bill was drafted in response to an audit from Oregon’s Secretary of State’s Office, which called for periodic review of existing property tax exemptions and tax credits.

In light of the objections to HB 2859, though, Barnhart said he thought the sunset provisions related to natural resources should be eliminated from the bill.

The suggestion drew no objections from other committee members, so Barnhart said they would only consider the remaining provisions of HB 2859 related to economic development and other issues.

“I think you should consider all of what I just said means that you win,” Barnhart told the audience, to enthusiastic applause.

Farmers, ranchers and forestland owners at the hearing emphasized that natural resource industries were already highly uncertain due to the weather and volatile markets.

Landowners said they shouldn’t also have to contend with the possibility their property taxes may rise dramatically every six years, which is the period of sunset review established under HB 2859.

“In the orchard business, we need to plan long term,” said Bruce Chapin, a hazelnut producer near Keizer, Ore.

Marsha Carr, a forestland owner near Monroe, Ore., said her annual property taxes would rise from about $1,000 to more than $25,000 under HB 2859.

Carr said her family harvests timber in small patches of five to seven acres, which preserves habitat for wildlife and songbirds.

“That would have to change to pay the taxes,” she said. “We would have to cut larger areas.”

Farmers rely on specialized equipment but they often operate it for only a month or less per year, unlike other industries where machinery creates revenues year-round, said Roger Beyer, a lobbyist for the Western Equipment Dealers Association and several crop organizations.

If property taxes were imposed on farm machinery, it would destroy demand for machinery, he said. “It would simply dry up and go away.”

Landowners also testified that property would unfairly be taxed at the maximum assessed value if the farm use assessment was allowed to expire.

Oregon’s land use system would still prevent landowners in farm zones from building homes or other high-value structures on their property, even if it was taxed as if such construction was possible, opponents said.

Mark Simmons, a rancher from Elgin, Ore., said the farm use assessment is part of a “grand bargain” between land use restrictions and property taxes.

While it’s currently tough to raise cattle on Simmons’ property, it could be a “gold mine” for development, he said.

“It’s mostly rocks and cheatgrass,” he said. “Some of those rocky hills with cheat grass have a view.”

SALEM — Oregon Ag Fest is soliciting applications for its fifth annual Agricultural Education Award.

The purpose of the award is to reward student organizations, nonprofit groups or classrooms that promote and educate Oregonians about agriculture and extend the Oregon Ag Fest mission beyond its annual, two-day, interactive event.

Applications are due March 15 and can be downloaded from the Oregon Ag Fest website: http://oragfest.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AgEducationAwardForm_2017.pdf.

Cash prizes totaling up to $2,000 may be awarded to as many as three winners annually. Awards will be presented on stage during Oregon Ag Fest on April 30. Award prizes will depend on quality of applications submitted.

“As Oregon Ag Fest celebrates 30 years of growing awareness for the importance of agriculture in our communities, we are proud to continue to support the agricultural education outreach efforts of nonprofit and student organizations this year,” said Tami Kerr, Oregon Ag Fest Chair, in a press release. “Oregon Ag Fest is dedicated to educating the public about the importance of agriculture, and we see this award as a way to encourage and support student groups that have programs and activities aimed to accomplish the same thing.”

Oregon Ag Fest attracts over 19,000 people who experience the world of Oregon agriculture in a fun-filled, festive environment. For more information go to www.oragfest.com.

Farmers can boost agritourism revenues by banding together to create high-profile events that attract far-flung visitors to their region, according to a tourism expert.

Agritourism is a growing source of income for U.S. growers but the industry isn’t as mature as in Italy, France and other European countries, said Lisa Chase, a natural resources specialist who studies agritourism at the University of Vermont.

While U.S. farmers have made significant progress in direct sales to consumers through farmers’ markets and similar venues, they’re lagging behind in “immersive” experiences, such as offering on-farm lodgings, she said.

“There are tremendous opportunities we’re just starting to touch on,” said Chase.

To entice tourists, growers can partner with other agritourism operations to develop a “bigger package” of multiple events and destinations, she said.

“Maybe that’s going to make people come all the way to Oregon,” Chase said during a recent “agritourism summit” organized by Oregon State University.

Emphasizing the unique agricultural traits of a region can also forestall acrimony from surrounding farmers, who may otherwise feel irritated by events that are disconnected from production agriculture, she said.

“That can cause some friction in the agricultural community,” Chase said.

Bauman Farms near Gervais, Ore., is well-acquainted with the need to create a destination for tourists.

The operation is “on the way to nowhere” and must lure visitors on its own merits, rather than rely on passersby, said Brian Bauman, its general manager.

“It’s about creating that festive atmosphere,” he said.

The farm has pumpkins for Halloween and pies for Thanksgiving, but it’s also found reasons for people to visit after the holidays. For example, speeches by local experts, including authors, gardeners and cooks, are paired with a traditional “high tea” in the farm house.

“It’s turned into this really great experience they’re almost fighting to get into,” Bauman said, noting that painting classes at the farm are also proving popular.

Agritourism brings in the most revenues for farmers along the West Coast and New England, while growers in areas like southern Texas benefit from allowing hunters onto their land, said Chase, citing USDA statistics.

Farmers tend to focus on agritourism related to crops and livestock, but many also own woodlots that can serve as sources of entertainment, she said. “Those are often overlooked opportunities.”

Across the U.S., sales from agritourism and direct marketing doubled between 2002 and 2012, from about $1 billion to $2 billion, according to the agency’s Census of Agriculture.

The trend is reflected in Oregon, where agritourism and direct marketing revenues grew from $24 million in 2002 to $55 million in 2012.

Despite the overall upward trajectory, these revenues were actually higher in Oregon in 2007, when they hit $63 million.

“I really think it’s a reflection of the global recession,” said Mary Stewart, an applied economics and agritourism faculty member with OSU’s extension service.

Direct marketing and agritourism revenues likely dipped between 2007 and 2012 in Oregon due to the decline in leisure spending by consumers as well as wariness among farmers to invest in such ventures, she said.

“I feel very positive we will see a rebound when the next census comes out,” Stewart said.

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Ammon Bundy, who was recently acquitted in the armed occupation of a national wildlife refuge in Oregon, testified Tuesday that he felt “driven” to protest federal control of Western lands after learning that two Oregon ranchers were imprisoned for setting fires on public rangeland.

Bundy was brought to the federal courtroom in Portland from Las Vegas, where he is in custody awaiting trial on charges he led armed gunmen to block a federal cattle roundup near his father’s Nevada ranch in 2014.

A defense attorney for Bundy’s fellow occupier Jason Patrick of Bonaire, Georgia, walked Bundy through the series of events that led him and others to seize the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge on Jan. 2, 2016. Bundy, his brother Ryan and five others were acquitted in the Oregon case last fall.

Duane Ehmer of Irrigon, Oregon; Darryl Thorn of Marysville, Washington; and Jake Ryan of Plains, Montana, are on trial.

In response to questions from defense attorney Andrew Kohlmetz, Bundy said that the seeds for the refuge takeover were planted in October 2015, when he first heard about Dwight and Steven Hammond, two ranchers from rural Oregon who were about to report to prison for a five-year sentence after being convicted of setting fires on public rangeland.

He was lying in bed when he read an article about their case and “when I read that article, it was like I was pushed out of that bed and I needed to learn more,” he said. “I felt driven and I don’t know how to quite explain it. ...I felt a drive, an urge, to find out all I can and to get myself familiar with what was going on.”

He spent all night reading about the case online, wrote a blog post and wrote a letter that was eventually sent to 28,000 people by email, he testified.

Shackled and wearing a blue prison outfit, Bundy testified that he identified with the Oregon ranchers because he felt his own family had been targeted in a similar fashion by federal Bureau of Land Management agents who were trying to seize his father’s cattle in a decades-long dispute over grazing rules and unpaid fees.

In April 2014, Bundy backers pointed weapons at BLM agents and contract cowboys who were rounding up cattle near the Bundy ranch outside Bunkerville, Nevada, according to federal prosecutors. Bundy, his brother Ryan and his father, Cliven, are all scheduled for trial later this year on charges including conspiracy, firearms offenses and assault of a federal officer in the Nevada standoff.

“My conclusion was what was happening to them was very similar to what had happened to my family,” Bundy said of the Hammonds.

He decided to drive to Burns, Oregon from his home in Idaho because he wanted to learn “why families like ours and the Hammonds ... are in the situation we’re in where we’re losing our heritage,” he said.

Bundy met with the Hammonds and also with the Harney County sheriff in the hopes he would “bring light and stand for the Hammonds” by pushing back against federal authorities and convening a county-run investigation, he said.

Harney County Sheriff Dave Ward testified during Bundy’s trial last year that he met with Bundy four times but ultimately disagreed that it was his role to intervene on behalf of the Hammonds. He felt Bundy was making ultimatums and warned him that the community wouldn’t tolerate the kind of actions Bundy’s family had taken at the Nevada ranch, he has said.

The Bundys were arrested in a Jan. 26 traffic stop away from the refuge that ended with police fatally shooting Robert “LaVoy” Finicum, an occupation spokesman. Most occupiers left the refuge after Finicum’s death, but a few holdouts remained until Feb. 11, 2016.

The acquittal of the Bundy brothers and the five others in what had seemed to be an open-and-shut case was a stunning blow for federal prosecutors last October.

Like the defendants in the first trial, the primary charge facing the men is conspiracy to impede Interior Department employees from doing their jobs at the refuge through the use of force, threats or intimidation.

This time, prosecutors hired an outside consultant to help them with jury selection and hedged their bets by adding misdemeanors such as trespassing to the mix of charges against the four men. The misdemeanor charges will be heard in a non-jury trial after the felony trial ends.

A calf found dead on private land in Southern Oregon’s Jackson County was killed by a wolf, according to the state Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The three-day-old calf was found by a ranch employee Feb. 25. ODFW investigated that day and found wolf tracks in the snow around the carcass. The entrails and internal organs had been eaten. Bite marks on the carcass were wider and deeper than coyote bites, according to an ODFW report.

Data from a GPS radio collar showed a wolf designated OR-25 was at the kill site at 1 a.m. and 5 a.m. on Feb. 25. OR-25 is a male that dispersed from the Imnaha Pack in northeast Oregon in March 2015 and traveled through the Columbia Basin, southern Blue Mountains and the northern and central Cascades.

The attack happened in the Red Blanket Creek area.